Shore v. Beck

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 5, 2004
• Docket: 03-7100
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7100

ROBERT GORDON SHORE, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THEODIS BECK; BONNIE BOYETTE; B. A. THOMPSON; BUTCH JACKSON; MICHAEL E. BUMGARNER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-02-847-H-5)

Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 5, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Gordon Shore, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Robert Gordon Shore, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Shore v. Beck, No. CA-02-847-H-5 (E.D.N.C. July 7,

2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -