Shorb v. Laird

1 Tapp. Rep. 339
CourtStark County Court of Common Pleas
DecidedAugust 15, 1819
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Tapp. Rep. 339 (Shorb v. Laird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Stark County Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shorb v. Laird, 1 Tapp. Rep. 339 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1819).

Opinion

President

The statute allows an appeal “ from judgment of any justice of the peace,” and is supposed to be broad enough in its terms to include this case unless it shall be found to be excepted by some other provision of the law. The process issued by Mr. Webb is a scire facias to shew cause why execution should not issue on the judgment rendered by Mr. Brown; in such cases the statute provides that “if the defendant is found, and cannot prove to the satisfaction of the justice, that he has paid the whole amount of the debt and costs, as stated in the transcript, the justice shall hold him to bail, or issue execution for the same, or such parts thereof as shall appear to remain unsatisfied, in the same manner and under the same regulations as the justice before whom the proceedings were originally had, might, or could have done, had the defendant remained with his township.” It appears that the defendants were found, and appeared before the justice at the return of the scire facias. The scire facias quare executionem non, being before another justice than the one who rendered the original judgment, makes no difference as to the right of appeal, for the proceedings are to be the same as though the defendants had remained in the township where the judgment was first entered.

The judgment before Mr. Justice Brown, was by confession, from which, by the express provision of the Statute “there shall be no appeal.” The scire facias quare executionem non, is a process to revive an existing, not to be the foundation of a new judgment. When revived, it is, as it was at first, a judgment from which there shall be no appeal.

The words of the statute, allowing an appeal “from any judgment of any justice ” are conceived by the appellants, to be extensive enough to include every judgment which can be rendered by a justice of the peace. But beside the case of judgments by confession, in which the right of appeal is taken away, these general terms must be limited'by the nature of the case to which they are attempted to be applied, and be confined to those judgments which are final between the parties. The award of an execution upon such scire facias, although it includes a judgment for costs, is not such judgment as the law intends to allow an appeal from; it is, as before observed, the revival of a former judgment, and after the time within which such judgment might be appealed from, must have elapsed. Appeal quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Tapp. Rep. 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shorb-v-laird-ohctcomplstark-1819.