Shopsin v. Siben

213 A.D.2d 394, 624 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2487
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shopsin v. Siben. Read the opinion of the Court — 189 A.D.2d 811

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), entered October 18, 1993, which denied their motion for an order directing the plaintiff to furnish them with a duly executed authorization to review the Nassau County clerk’s file of the matrimonial action entitled Shopsin v Shopsin.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The speculative assertions made by the defendants in support of their motion failed to establish a sufficient nexus between their claimed defenses and the marital proceedings to overcome the statutory protection accorded to testimony and pleadings in a matrimonial action (see, Domestic Relations Law § 235; Harvey v Mazal Am. Partners, 179 AD2d 1, 9). Balletta, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shopsin v. Siben, 213 A.D.2d 394, 624 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2487 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

213 A.D.2d 394 (Shopsin v. Siben) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harvey v. Mazal American Partners
179 A.D.2d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)