Shoppa v. State
This text of 277 S.W. 123 (Shoppa v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant was convicted in the District Court of Williamson County for manufacturing intoxicating liquor and his punishment assessed at one year in the penitentiary.
There are four bills contained in this record and each of them is in question and answer form, and there is no certificate of the court showing that it was necessary to prepare these bills in this manner.
Under the unbroken line of authorities in this. State these bills of exception, cannot be considered. Robbins v. State, 272 S. W. 176, and cases there cited. Beard v. State, 273 S. W. 573.
*216 The facts contained in the record are entirely sufficient to support the judgment and no error being manifested by the record, it is our opinion that the judgment should be in all things affirmed. Affirmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 S.W. 123, 102 Tex. Crim. 215, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shoppa-v-state-texcrimapp-1925.