Shope v. Eagle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Shope v. Eagle

699 A.2d 727, 548 Pa. 563, 1997 Pa. LEXIS 1815

DecidedSeptember 3, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 699 A.2d 727 (Shope v. Eagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shope v. Eagle, 699 A.2d 727, 548 Pa. 563, 1997 Pa. LEXIS 1815 (Pa. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

[728]*728 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 1997, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, but LIMITED to the following issues:

1. Whether prejudice to a defendant needs to be demonstrated to justify termination of a case pursuant to Pa.R.J.A.1901 and York County Rule 6035, and if so, whether the requisite prejudice has been established in this case?

2. Whether a case may be terminated pursuant to Pa.R.J.A.1901 and York County Rule 6035 if delay is attributable to a defendant, and if not, whether Respondents’ conduct precludes termination in this case?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[728]*728 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 1997, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, but LIMITED to the following issues:

1. Whether prejudice to a defendant needs to be demonstrated to justify termination of a case pursuant to Pa.R.J.A.1901 and York County Rule 6035, and if so, whether the requisite prejudice has been established in this case?

2. Whether a case may be terminated pursuant to Pa.R.J.A.1901 and York County Rule 6035 if delay is attributable to a defendant, and if not, whether Respondents’ conduct precludes termination in this case?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

699 A.2d 727, 548 Pa. 563, 1997 Pa. LEXIS 1815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shope-v-eagle-pa-1997.