Shook v. Shook
This text of 435 So. 2d 325 (Shook v. Shook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a final judgment dissolving a seven-year marriage involving no children. We find no error in the award to the wife of the husband’s interest in the marital home as an equitable distribution of the parties’ assets nor do we find an abuse of discretion in the award of rehabilitative alimony. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). We also affirm the trial court’s refusal to allow the husband to take the deposition of the wife’s treating psychiatrist where the wife did not offer the testimony of her psychiatrist and the court appointed a psychiatrist to examine the wife and testify at trial. See Roper v. Roper, 336 So.2d 654 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). All other points are without merit.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
435 So. 2d 325, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shook-v-shook-fladistctapp-1983.