Shongut v. Margolis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shongut v. Margolis

10 A.D.2d 885, 202 N.Y.S.2d 222, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10515

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 25, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 885 (Shongut v. Margolis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shongut v. Margolis, 10 A.D.2d 885, 202 N.Y.S.2d 222, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10515 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action on a contract dated February 26, 1953 (1st cause of action), for money had and received (2d cause of action), and on a contract dated February 10, 1953 (3d cause of action), the court, before which the action was tried without a jury, rendered a decision and made an order directing judgment in favor of plaintiff on the first cause of action and in favor of defendant on the second and third causes of action. Plaintiff appeals from so much of the judgment thereafter entered on such decision and [886]*886order as dismissed the second and third causes of action; and defendant cross-appeals from so much of said judgment as is in favor of plaintiff on the first cause of action. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action on a contract dated February 26, 1953 (1st cause of action), for money had and received (2d cause of action), and on a contract dated February 10, 1953 (3d cause of action), the court, before which the action was tried without a jury, rendered a decision and made an order directing judgment in favor of plaintiff on the first cause of action and in favor of defendant on the second and third causes of action. Plaintiff appeals from so much of the judgment thereafter entered on such decision and [886]*886order as dismissed the second and third causes of action; and defendant cross-appeals from so much of said judgment as is in favor of plaintiff on the first cause of action. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 885, 202 N.Y.S.2d 222, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shongut-v-margolis-nyappdiv-1960.