Shomo v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shomo v. State

203 A.D.2d 875, 612 N.Y.S.2d 964, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4357

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1994

DocketClaim No. 71855

StatusPublished

This text of 203 A.D.2d 875 (Shomo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shomo v. State, 203 A.D.2d 875, 612 N.Y.S.2d 964, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4357 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment in favor of claimant, entered January 20, 1993, upon a decision of the Court of Claims (Lyons, J.).

Following a nonjury trial, the Court of Claims awarded claimant a total of $500 in damages for injuries sustained as a result of being negligently exposed to insecticide spray while he was a prison inmate. In light of the relatively minor [876]*876physical effects suffered by claimant, as demonstrated by the record and the lack of any indication that claimant’s symptoms are permanent or likely to recur in the future, we find no reason to disturb the judgment of the Court of Claims.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment in favor of claimant, entered January 20, 1993, upon a decision of the Court of Claims (Lyons, J.).

Following a nonjury trial, the Court of Claims awarded claimant a total of $500 in damages for injuries sustained as a result of being negligently exposed to insecticide spray while he was a prison inmate. In light of the relatively minor [876]*876physical effects suffered by claimant, as demonstrated by the record and the lack of any indication that claimant’s symptoms are permanent or likely to recur in the future, we find no reason to disturb the judgment of the Court of Claims.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 A.D.2d 875, 612 N.Y.S.2d 964, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shomo-v-state-nyappdiv-1994.