Shomo v. Ransom
This text of 18 S.E. 534 (Shomo v. Ransom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The facts appear in the official report. There can be no doubt that the contract alleged in the declaration for the sale of five hundred eases of eggs was an unconditional contract. It is equally certain that no such contract appears in the evidence, for the contract to which that points was conditional and the condition was of such a nature as to render the variance material. Putting aside other questions raised and discussed in the case, this is a decisive one. With or without considering the affidavit which was before the court, the judgment of nonsuit was correct. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 S.E. 534, 92 Ga. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shomo-v-ransom-ga-1893.