Shomo v. Caldwell

21 Ala. 448
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 15, 1852
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 21 Ala. 448 (Shomo v. Caldwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shomo v. Caldwell, 21 Ala. 448 (Ala. 1852).

Opinion

LIGON, J.

— When the plaintiff in an action of detinue has color of title, and has had peaceable possession of the chattel sued for, he can recover as against.a mere wrong-doer who, by indirection or force, obtains and holds the present possession.

Such is the case here; and without reference to the rights of Mrs. Shomo in equity, if she has any, we think Caldwell is placed, by his bill of sale, and his possession under it, in such a position with relation to the slaves in controversy, as to entitle him to recover of the defendant in the court below in this form of action.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment of the Circuit Court is consequently affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morgan v. Jackson
69 N.E. 410 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1904)
Jones v. Anderson
76 Ala. 427 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Ala. 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shomo-v-caldwell-ala-1852.