Shomo v. Caldwell

21 Ala. 448
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1852·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

LIGON, J.

— When the plaintiff in an action of detinue has color of title, and has had peaceable possession of the chattel sued for, he can recover as against.a mere wrong-doer who, by indirection or force, obtains and holds the present possession.

Such is the case here; and without reference to the rights of Mrs. Shomo in equity, if she has any, we think Caldwell is placed, by his bill of sale, and his possession under it, in such a position with relation to the slaves in controversy, as to entitle him to recover of the defendant in the court below in this form of action.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment of the Circuit Court is consequently affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shomo v. Caldwell, 21 Ala. 448 (Ala. 1852).

21 Ala. 448 (Shomo v. Caldwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morgan v. Jackson
69 N.E. 410 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1904)
Jones v. Anderson
76 Ala. 427 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)