Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. McMaster

169 So. 50, 124 Fla. 267
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 9, 1936·No. Case No. 2395.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen, and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is therefore considered, ordered, and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed upon the authority' of the opinion and judgment of this court in the case of Sholtz v. State ex rel. Ben Hur Life Association, 165 So. 39.

Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. McMaster, 169 So. 50, 124 Fla. 267 (Fla. 1936).

169 So. 50 (Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. McMaster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Ben Hur Life Ass'n
165 So. 39 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)