Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. McMaster

169 So. 50, 124 Fla. 267
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 9, 1936
DocketCase No. 2395.
StatusPublished

This text of 169 So. 50 (Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. McMaster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. McMaster, 169 So. 50, 124 Fla. 267 (Fla. 1936).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen, and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is therefore considered, ordered, and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed upon the authority' of the opinion and judgment of this court in the case of Sholtz v. State ex rel. Ben Hur Life Association, 165 So. 39.

Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Ben Hur Life Ass'n
165 So. 39 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 So. 50, 124 Fla. 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sholtz-v-state-ex-rel-mcmaster-fla-1936.