Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Jones

168 So. 803, 124 Fla. 164
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 20, 1936·No. Case 2514·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the Plaintiffs in Error, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is- no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the *165 said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby-affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Jones, 168 So. 803, 124 Fla. 164 (Fla. 1936).

168 So. 803 (Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Insurers Ass'n v. Monroe County
26 F. Supp. 745 (S.D. Florida, 1939)