Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Hopkins

Supreme Court of Florida

Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Hopkins

165 So. 44, 122 Fla. 311

DecidedDecember 31, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 165 So. 44 (Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Hopkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Hopkins, 165 So. 44, 122 Fla. 311 (Fla. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error brings for review judgment awarding peremptory writ of mandamus' against the plaintiff in error.

The legal principles involved are like those adjudicated in the case of Sholtz, et al., v. State, ex rel. Ben Hur Life Assurance Corp. (No. 2185) in which opinion was filed at the present term of the Court and the judgment is affirmed on the authority of the opinion and judgment in that case.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI