Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Hopkins

Supreme Court of Florida

Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Hopkins

165 So. 44, 122 Fla. 311

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 31, 1935·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error brings for review judgment awarding peremptory writ of mandamus' against the plaintiff in error.

The legal principles involved are like those adjudicated in the case of Sholtz, et al., v. State, ex rel. Ben Hur Life Assurance Corp. (No. 2185) in which opinion was filed at the present term of the Court and the judgment is affirmed on the authority of the opinion and judgment in that case.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The writ of error brings for review judgment awarding peremptory writ of mandamus' against the plaintiff in error.

The legal principles involved are like those adjudicated in the case of Sholtz, et al., v. State, ex rel. Ben Hur Life Assurance Corp. (No. 2185) in which opinion was filed at the present term of the Court and the judgment is affirmed on the authority of the opinion and judgment in that case.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Hopkins, 165 So. 44, 122 Fla. 311 (Fla. 1935).

Pincite

165 So. 44 (Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Hopkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.