Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Davis

168 So. 922, 124 Fla. 325
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 121 Fla. 477
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 22, 1936·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for *326 the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of. its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford .and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Davis, 168 So. 922, 124 Fla. 325 (Fla. 1936).

168 So. 922 (Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.