Sholk v. Cayer

166 A. 152, 113 N.J. Eq. 170, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1005
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 28, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 166 A. 152 (Sholk v. Cayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sholk v. Cayer, 166 A. 152, 113 N.J. Eq. 170, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1005 (N.J. 1933).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Backes in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trehchard, Parker, Lloyd, Oase, Bodine, Dohges, Hehbr, Vah Buskirk, Kays, PIetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A. 152, 113 N.J. Eq. 170, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sholk-v-cayer-nj-1933.