Sholk v. Cayer
166 A. 152, 113 N.J. Eq. 170, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1005
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Backes in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trehchard, Parker, Lloyd, Oase, Bodine, Dohges, Hehbr, Vah Buskirk, Kays, PIetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sholk v. Cayer, 166 A. 152, 113 N.J. Eq. 170, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1005 (N.J. 1933).
166 A. 152 (Sholk v. Cayer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.