Sholes v. Stoddard

1 Kirby 163
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided September 15, 1786·Published

Opinion

. . MotioN was made in court for a new trial, and it was said by one of the judges, that if the motion be made, and reduced to writing the same term the first trial is had, it is sufficient notice to hold the adverse party to appear and answer: But the motion was continued to next term, that notice might be given; and the court refused to stay execution in the meantime.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sholes v. Stoddard, 1 Kirby 163 (Colo. Ct. App. 1786).

1 Kirby 163 (Sholes v. Stoddard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.