Shofstall Hay & Grain Co. v. United States

Court of Claims

Shofstall Hay & Grain Co. v. United States

65 Ct. Cl. 653, 1928 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 394, 1928 WL 3007

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedMay 28, 1928

DocketNo. B-120

StatusPublished

This text of 65 Ct. Cl. 653 (Shofstall Hay & Grain Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shofstall Hay & Grain Co. v. United States, 65 Ct. Cl. 653, 1928 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 394, 1928 WL 3007 (cc 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Moss, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.:

This case was submitted with the cases of Dyer & Company v. United, States, B-119, and Albert Miller et al. v. United States, B-121, on the evidence taken in the three cases. The opinion in the Miller ease, decided as of this date, is appli[662]*662cable to the questions involved in the instant case. Plaintiff is entitled to recover as follows:

On weight shortages_$2, 541.19

Total rejections_'- 10, 285.64

Deductions for minimum car weights- 265.67

Reconsigning charges_ 45.32

Demurrage deductions- 80.34

Underallowanee on freight- 122.12

Repricing and regrading- 3, 644. 59

Total_ 16,984.87

And it is so ordered.

GREEN, Judge; Graham, Judge; and Booth, Ohief Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI