Shoesmith v. H. Meyer Boot & Shoe Manufacturing Co.
198 U.S. 582, 25 S. Ct. 804, 49 L. Ed. 1172, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 948
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661; Maynard v. Hecht, 151 U. S. 324; United States v. Jahn, 155 U. S. 109, 113; Louisville Trust Company v. Knott, 191 U. S. 225, 232.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shoesmith v. H. Meyer Boot & Shoe Manufacturing Co., 198 U.S. 582, 25 S. Ct. 804, 49 L. Ed. 1172, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 948 (1905).
198 U.S. 582 (Shoesmith v. H. Meyer Boot & Shoe Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McLish v. Roff
141 U.S. 661 (Supreme Court, 1891)
Maynard v. Hecht
151 U.S. 324 (Supreme Court, 1894)
United States v. Jahn
155 U.S. 109 (Supreme Court, 1894)
Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott
191 U.S. 225 (Supreme Court, 1903)