Shoemaker v. White-Dulaney Co.

232 P. 695, 132 Wash. 699, 1925 Wash. LEXIS 816
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 6, 1925
DocketNo. 18557. En Banc.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 232 P. 695 (Shoemaker v. White-Dulaney Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shoemaker v. White-Dulaney Co., 232 P. 695, 132 Wash. 699, 1925 Wash. LEXIS 816 (Wash. 1925).

Opinion

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

Upon a rehearing En Banc, the court adhere to the Departmental opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in 131 Wash. 347, 230 Pac. 162.

The disposition there directed is therefore the order of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wenatchee Production Credit Ass'n v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.
92 P.2d 883 (Washington Supreme Court, 1939)
Nohrnberg v. Boley
246 P. 12 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 P. 695, 132 Wash. 699, 1925 Wash. LEXIS 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shoemaker-v-white-dulaney-co-wash-1925.