Shoemaker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Shoemaker v. State

1916 OK CR 126, 159 P. 921, 12 Okla. Crim. 626, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 133

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 15, 1916

DocketNo. A-2615.

StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK CR 126 (Shoemaker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shoemaker v. State, 1916 OK CR 126, 159 P. 921, 12 Okla. Crim. 626, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 133 (Okla. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, George Shoemaker, was convicted at the October, 1915, term of the Nowata district court, charged with maintaining a place wherein intoxicating liquors were kept and sold, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $300 and imprisonment in the county jail for 'nine months. Judgment was pronounced in the trial court on the third day of November, 1915.

*627 The appeal was filed in this court on December 29, 1915. No briefs have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error and when the cause was assigned for oral argument in this court, no appearance was made or argument offered. It appears that the appeal has been abandoned.

The Attorney General, in open court, moved the affirmation of the judgment upon the ground that the appeal had not been prosecuted as by law provided and had been abandoned. The motion is sustained and the judgment affirmed. Mandate ordered forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, George Shoemaker, was convicted at the October, 1915, term of the Nowata district court, charged with maintaining a place wherein intoxicating liquors were kept and sold, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $300 and imprisonment in the county jail for 'nine months. Judgment was pronounced in the trial court on the third day of November, 1915.

*627 The appeal was filed in this court on December 29, 1915. No briefs have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error and when the cause was assigned for oral argument in this court, no appearance was made or argument offered. It appears that the appeal has been abandoned.

The Attorney General, in open court, moved the affirmation of the judgment upon the ground that the appeal had not been prosecuted as by law provided and had been abandoned. The motion is sustained and the judgment affirmed. Mandate ordered forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1916 OK CR 126, 159 P. 921, 12 Okla. Crim. 626, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shoemaker-v-state-oklacrimapp-1916.