Shoemaker v. State
113 So. 3d 938, 2013 WL 275257, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1026
This text of 113 So. 3d 938 (Shoemaker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shoemaker v. State, 113 So. 3d 938, 2013 WL 275257, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1026 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
Opinion
The State appropriately concedes error because Appellant did not receive notice of [939]*939the restitution hearing. See Papageorge v. State, 710 So.2d 53, 55 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand this cause for a new hearing.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Papageorge v. State
710 So. 2d 53 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
113 So. 3d 938, 2013 WL 275257, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shoemaker-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.