Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Shoemaker v. State

Shoemaker v. State

113 So. 3d 938, 2013 WL 275257, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1026
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 25, 2013·No. No. 5D11-3856·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appropriately concedes error because Appellant did not receive notice of [939]*939the restitution hearing. See Papageorge v. State, 710 So.2d 53, 55 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand this cause for a new hearing.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

PALMER, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shoemaker v. State, 113 So. 3d 938, 2013 WL 275257, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1026 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

113 So. 3d 938 (Shoemaker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Papageorge v. State
710 So. 2d 53 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)