Shoemaker v. Shirtliffe
1 U.S. 133, 1 Dall. 133
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shoemaker v. Shirtliffe. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 U.S. 127 →
Opinion
were of opinion, that the warrant of attorney reciting the bond, was only an instrument subservient to it; and, consequently, that the execution could not be issued, till the time given for payment was expired.
The execution set aside.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shoemaker v. Shirtliffe, 1 U.S. 133, 1 Dall. 133 (1785).
1 U.S. 133 (Shoemaker v. Shirtliffe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.