Shoemaker v. Reese

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Shoemaker v. Reese

91 S.E. 1065, 19 Ga. App. 660, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 295

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 4, 1917

Docket8002

StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.E. 1065 (Shoemaker v. Reese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shoemaker v. Reese, 91 S.E. 1065, 19 Ga. App. 660, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 295 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The 'answer- of the 'justice of the peace to the writ of certiorari denied the truth of the allegations of the petition, and the judge of the superior court did not err in entering the following judgment in the cause, to wit: “The traverse to the answer of the magistrate having been found in favor of the answer, and the answer not showing that any plea was ever filed or tendered, I do not think the court committed any error in entering judgment for the plaintiff in this case.. The suit was upon an itemized, verified account, and personal service on the defendant. It is ordered and adjudged that the certiorari be and the same is hereby overruled and dismissed.”

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and George, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The 'answer- of the 'justice of the peace to the writ of certiorari denied the truth of the allegations of the petition, and the judge of the superior court did not err in entering the following judgment in the cause, to wit: “The traverse to the answer of the magistrate having been found in favor of the answer, and the answer not showing that any plea was ever filed or tendered, I do not think the court committed any error in entering judgment for the plaintiff in this case.. The suit was upon an itemized, verified account, and personal service on the defendant. It is ordered and adjudged that the certiorari be and the same is hereby overruled and dismissed.”

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and George, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 S.E. 1065, 19 Ga. App. 660, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shoemaker-v-reese-gactapp-1917.