Shoemaker v. Oregon State Penitentiary

752 P.2d 352, 90 Or. App. 426
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 13, 1988
Docket09-87-094; CA A46174
StatusPublished

This text of 752 P.2d 352 (Shoemaker v. Oregon State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shoemaker v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 752 P.2d 352, 90 Or. App. 426 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner challenges the imposition of a fine as part of the penalty for violation of a disciplinary rule. Respondent confesses error, and we agree. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).

Fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watson v. Oregon State Penitentiary
750 P.2d 1188 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
752 P.2d 352, 90 Or. App. 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shoemaker-v-oregon-state-penitentiary-orctapp-1988.