Shoemaker v. Keeley
1 Yeates 245
Opinion
The form of the action is decisive. The damages here are as uncertain as in any species of trespass, and cannot be assigned over by the commissioners. Matters of ■ mere tort were not contemplated by the legislature when they enacted the bankrupt law. The assignees might, if they had thought proper, have brought assumpsit, and then the defendant would have had the benefit of a set-off; but, the suit in its present form, cannot be supported.
Judgment for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shoemaker v. Keeley, 1 Yeates 245 (Pa. 1793).
1 Yeates 245 (Shoemaker v. Keeley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whitaker v. Gavit
18 Conn. 522 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1847)