Shoemaker v. Huffnagle
4 Watts & Serg. 437
This text of 4 Watts & Serg. 437 (Shoemaker v. Huffnagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shoemaker v. Huffnagle, 4 Watts & Serg. 437 (Pa. 1842).
Opinion
— The court being satisfied with the opinion of the judge before whom the cause was tried, as also the reasoning contained in it, do therefore approve and adopt it. The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Yarnall's Appeal
70 Pa. 335 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1872)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Watts & Serg. 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shoemaker-v-huffnagle-pa-1842.