Shoemaker v. Huffnagle
4 Watts & Serg. 437
Opinion
— The court being satisfied with the opinion of the judge before whom the cause was tried, as also the reasoning contained in it, do therefore approve and adopt it. The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shoemaker v. Huffnagle, 4 Watts & Serg. 437 (Pa. 1842).
4 Watts & Serg. 437 (Shoemaker v. Huffnagle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Yarnall's Appeal
70 Pa. 335 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1872)