Shoemake v. State

148 P. 1150, 11 Okla. Crim. 715
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 1, 1900
DocketNo. A-2173.
StatusPublished

This text of 148 P. 1150 (Shoemake v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shoemake v. State, 148 P. 1150, 11 Okla. Crim. 715 (Okla. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

*716 PEE CUBIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Eve Shoemake, jointly informed • against with A. 3?. Holmes, was separately tried and convicted upon an information which charged they did have in their possession eighty-two quarts of beer and twenty quarts and forty half pints of whisky, with the purpose and intent to sell the same. In pursuance of the verdict she was sentenced to pay a fine of three hundred fifty dollars and costs taxed, fifty-six dollars, and to be confined in the county jail for thirty days.

An appeal from the judgment was taken by filing in this court on January 19, 1914, a petition in error with ease-made.

The evidence shows that the liquors were found beneath the floor of a coal house, adjoining a house of ill fame conducted by the plaintiff in error. The defendant as a witness in her own behalf testified that the outhouse where the liquors were found was not in her possession; that it was kept by a negro who rented it from her, paying her three dollars per month. After a careful examination of the record, our conclusion is that the various errors assigned are without merit, and that there can be no doubt of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury. Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 P. 1150, 11 Okla. Crim. 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shoemake-v-state-oklacrimapp-1900.