Shoemake v. Benton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Shoemake v. Benton

821 S.W.2d 136, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 88, 1992 WL 4051

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 14, 1992·No. No. 59496·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant (Driver) appeals an order sustaining the Director of Revenue’s decision to revoke Appellant’s driver’s license for one year pursuant to § 577.041, RSMo (Cum.Supp.1990). Affirmed. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant (Driver) appeals an order sustaining the Director of Revenue’s decision to revoke Appellant’s driver’s license for one year pursuant to § 577.041, RSMo (Cum.Supp.1990). Affirmed. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Shoemake v. Benton, 821 S.W.2d 136, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 88, 1992 WL 4051 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

821 S.W.2d 136 (Shoemake v. Benton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.