Shoemacker v. State
This text of 149 N.E. 924 (Shoemacker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was one of five jointly indicted, separately tried by a jury and convicted in the court below of having in his possession and under his control, June 30, 1923, certain distilling apparatus for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor. Acts 1923 p. 107, §1.
The questions presented and those sought to be presented by this appeal are, in all respects, the same as those considered and decided in Shoemaker v. State (1925), ante 433, 148 N. E. 403; Napier v. State (1925), ante 576, 149 N. E. 49; and Wallace v. State (1925), ante 509, 149 N. E. 57.
Upon the authority of those cases, the judgment in the instant case is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
149 N.E. 924, 196 Ind. 730, 1925 Ind. LEXIS 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shoemacker-v-state-ind-1925.