Home/First Circuit/Shoe Manufacturers' Supply Co. v. Stacy

Shoe Manufacturers' Supply Co. v. Stacy

105 F. 74, 44 C.C.A. 361, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 3810
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedNovember 8, 1900
DocketNo. 352
StatusPublished

This text of 105 F. 74 (Shoe Manufacturers' Supply Co. v. Stacy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shoe Manufacturers' Supply Co. v. Stacy, 105 F. 74, 44 C.C.A. 361, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 3810 (1st Cir. 1900).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Only the third claim of the patent in suit is in issue. As to that, we agree that it covers no patentable invention, as explained in the opinion of the learned judge who tried the case in the circuit court (100 Fed. 652), and for that reason we adopt his conclusions. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed, and the appellees will recover the costs of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shoe Manufacturers' Supply Co. v. Stacey
100 F. 652 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 F. 74, 44 C.C.A. 361, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 3810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shoe-manufacturers-supply-co-v-stacy-ca1-1900.