Shoe Manufacturers' Supply Co. v. Stacy
105 F. 74, 44 C.C.A. 361, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 3810
Opinion
Only the third claim of the patent in suit is in issue. As to that, we agree that it covers no patentable invention, as explained in the opinion of the learned judge who tried the case in the circuit court (100 Fed. 652), and for that reason we adopt his conclusions. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed, and the appellees will recover the costs of appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shoe Manufacturers' Supply Co. v. Stacy, 105 F. 74, 44 C.C.A. 361, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 3810 (1st Cir. 1900).
105 F. 74 (Shoe Manufacturers' Supply Co. v. Stacy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shoe Manufacturers' Supply Co. v. Stacey
100 F. 652 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1900)