Shockness v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Federal Circuit

Shockness v. Merit Systems Protection Board

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedFebruary 9, 2011

Docket2011-3022

StatusUnpublished

This text of Shockness v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Shockness v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shockness v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia1. United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit CAROLYN D. SHOCKNESS, Petiti0ner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. 2011-3022 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protecti0n Board in case no. DC0752090689-I-3. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of the motion to reform the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Proteotion Board as the respondent, IT ls 0RDERE1) THAT: (1) The motion is granted The revised official cap- tion is ref1ected above

SHOCKNESS V. MSPB 2 (2) The Board should calculate its brief due date from the date the petitioner serves her initial brief or from the date of issuance of this order, whichever is later. FoR THE CoURT FEB 0 9 2011 /s/ J an H0rbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Carolyn D. Schockness Charlie Kersten, Esq. David S. Brooks, Esq. 520 men U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCU|T FEB 09 2011 .lAN HDRBALY CLEH(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia1. United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit CAROLYN D. SHOCKNESS, Petiti0ner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. 2011-3022 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protecti0n Board in case no. DC0752090689-I-3. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of the motion to reform the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Proteotion Board as the respondent, IT ls 0RDERE1) THAT: (1) The motion is granted The revised official cap- tion is ref1ected above

SHOCKNESS V. MSPB 2 (2) The Board should calculate its brief due date from the date the petitioner serves her initial brief or from the date of issuance of this order, whichever is later. FoR THE CoURT FEB 0 9 2011 /s/ J an H0rbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Carolyn D. Schockness Charlie Kersten, Esq. David S. Brooks, Esq. 520 men U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCU|T FEB 09 2011 .lAN HDRBALY CLEH(

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Shockness v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shockness-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2011.