Shocklin v. State
69 S.E. 35, 8 Ga. App. 399, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 184
This text of 69 S.E. 35 (Shocklin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shocklin v. State, 69 S.E. 35, 8 Ga. App. 399, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 184 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).
Opinion
1. The ground added by amendment to the motion for a new trial is not verified or approved, and will not be considered. Henderson v. State, 7 Ga. App. 810 (68 S. E. 333).
2. In the brief submitted (the ease having been argued by brief alone) no reference is made to the general grounds of the motion; hence, they will be treated as abandoned. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Henderson v. State
68 S.E. 333 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
69 S.E. 35, 8 Ga. App. 399, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shocklin-v-state-gactapp-1910.