Shocklin v. State

69 S.E. 35, 8 Ga. App. 399, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 184
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 14, 1910·No. 2921·Published

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The ground added by amendment to the motion for a new trial is not verified or approved, and will not be considered. Henderson v. State, 7 Ga. App. 810 (68 S. E. 333).

2. In the brief submitted (the ease having been argued by brief alone) no reference is made to the general grounds of the motion; hence, they will be treated as abandoned. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shocklin v. State, 69 S.E. 35, 8 Ga. App. 399, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 184 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

69 S.E. 35 (Shocklin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henderson v. State
68 S.E. 333 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)