Shockley v. State

1931 OK CR 408, 3 P.2d 236, 52 Okla. Crim. 117, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 396
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 12, 1931
DocketNo. A-8058.
StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 408 (Shockley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shockley v. State, 1931 OK CR 408, 3 P.2d 236, 52 Okla. Crim. 117, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 396 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was by information jointly charged with Bill Kemp of having in their possession a still, was convicted, and the defendant Shockley was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and imprisonment for 30 days in the county jail, and appeals.

The testimony is sufficient to' sustain the judgment. *118 There are no fundamental errors in the record possessing sufficient merit to warrant a reversal.

The judgment is affirmed.

EDWARDS and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1931 OK CR 408, 3 P.2d 236, 52 Okla. Crim. 117, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shockley-v-state-oklacrimapp-1931.