Shockley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Shockley v. State

1931 OK CR 408, 3 P.2d 236, 52 Okla. Crim. 117, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 396

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided September 12, 1931·No. No. A-8058.·Published

Opinion

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was by information jointly charged with Bill Kemp of having in their possession a still, was convicted, and the defendant Shockley was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and imprisonment for 30 days in the county jail, and appeals.

The testimony is sufficient to' sustain the judgment. *118 There are no fundamental errors in the record possessing sufficient merit to warrant a reversal.

The judgment is affirmed.

EDWARDS and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was by information jointly charged with Bill Kemp of having in their possession a still, was convicted, and the defendant Shockley was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and imprisonment for 30 days in the county jail, and appeals.

The testimony is sufficient to' sustain the judgment. *118 There are no fundamental errors in the record possessing sufficient merit to warrant a reversal.

The judgment is affirmed.

EDWARDS and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Shockley v. State, 1931 OK CR 408, 3 P.2d 236, 52 Okla. Crim. 117, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 396 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

1931 OK CR 408 (Shockley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.