Shockley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Shockley v. State

818 S.W.2d 710, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1558, 1991 WL 206823

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 15, 1991·No. No. 59618·Published

Opinion

[711]*711ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from an order denying his Rule 24.035 motion on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. The trial court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[711]*711ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from an order denying his Rule 24.035 motion on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. The trial court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Shockley v. State, 818 S.W.2d 710, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1558, 1991 WL 206823 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

818 S.W.2d 710 (Shockley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.