Shockey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Shockey v. State

1914 OK CR 82, 140 P. 1198, 10 Okla. Crim. 686, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 215

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 21, 1914

DocketNo. A-2000.

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 82 (Shockey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shockey v. State, 1914 OK CR 82, 140 P. 1198, 10 Okla. Crim. 686, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 215 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was tried and convicted upon an information which charged the possession of intoxicating liquors, with the unlawful intent to violate provisions of the prohibitory law, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was on the 18th day of March, 1918, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a term of sixty days and to pay a fine of five hundred dollars. The evidence for the state shows that the defendant was arrested with four boxes of whisky in his possession and fifteen or twenty gunny sacks of liquor in a wagon. The defendant offered no evidence. A careful review of the record discloses no reversible error. The judgment of conviction is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was tried and convicted upon an information which charged the possession of intoxicating liquors, with the unlawful intent to violate provisions of the prohibitory law, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was on the 18th day of March, 1918, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a term of sixty days and to pay a fine of five hundred dollars. The evidence for the state shows that the defendant was arrested with four boxes of whisky in his possession and fifteen or twenty gunny sacks of liquor in a wagon. The defendant offered no evidence. A careful review of the record discloses no reversible error. The judgment of conviction is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK CR 82, 140 P. 1198, 10 Okla. Crim. 686, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shockey-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.