Shobe v. State
354 S.W.3d 672, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1700, 2011 WL 6628445
Opinion
ORDER
Earl D. Shobe appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prec-edential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shobe v. State, 354 S.W.3d 672, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1700, 2011 WL 6628445 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
354 S.W.3d 672 (Shobe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Presson v. State
354 S.W.3d 672 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)