Shnek v. Coronado Handbag & Novelties Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shnek v. Coronado Handbag & Novelties Corp.

2 A.D.2d 684, 153 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5141

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 684 (Shnek v. Coronado Handbag & Novelties Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shnek v. Coronado Handbag & Novelties Corp., 2 A.D.2d 684, 153 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover damages for breach of an oral contract of employment because of an alleged wrongful discharge. Respondent rendered services to defendant Coronado Handbag and Novelties Corporation under a written contract and subsequently under an oral contract which, on respondent’s evidence, bound both the defendant corporation and the appellant, Companion Bags, Inc., to pay his salary and expenses. The oral contract was made by respondent with an individual who is president of both corporations. The action was severed as to the defendant corporation and the jury rendered a verdict in favor of respondent against the appellant corporation. The appeal is from the judgment entered thereon. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover damages for breach of an oral contract of employment because of an alleged wrongful discharge. Respondent rendered services to defendant Coronado Handbag and Novelties Corporation under a written contract and subsequently under an oral contract which, on respondent’s evidence, bound both the defendant corporation and the appellant, Companion Bags, Inc., to pay his salary and expenses. The oral contract was made by respondent with an individual who is president of both corporations. The action was severed as to the defendant corporation and the jury rendered a verdict in favor of respondent against the appellant corporation. The appeal is from the judgment entered thereon. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 684, 153 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shnek-v-coronado-handbag-novelties-corp-nyappdiv-1956.