Shmunes v. Coffey Chevrolet & Oldsmobile, Inc.

251 S.E.2d 105, 148 Ga. App. 114, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 3039
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 14, 1978
Docket56450
StatusPublished

This text of 251 S.E.2d 105 (Shmunes v. Coffey Chevrolet & Oldsmobile, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shmunes v. Coffey Chevrolet & Oldsmobile, Inc., 251 S.E.2d 105, 148 Ga. App. 114, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 3039 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

Shulman, Judge.

This appeal is from the dismissal of appellant’s complaint against the appellee, one of several defendants, for failure to make discovery. The dismissal contained a certificate by the trial judge in accordance with Code Ann. § 81A-154 (b), determining that there is no just reason for delay and expressly directing the entry of judgment. There has not been, however, compliance with the interlocutory appeal procedures mandated by Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) 2. The appeal is, therefore, premature and must be dismissed. Thompson v. Clarkson Power Flow, Inc., 147 Ga. App. 770.

Appeal dismissed.

Bell, C. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. Clarkson Power Flow, Inc.
250 S.E.2d 508 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 S.E.2d 105, 148 Ga. App. 114, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 3039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shmunes-v-coffey-chevrolet-oldsmobile-inc-gactapp-1978.