Shmuel v. State
This text of 679 So. 2d 322 (Shmuel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed.
State v. Lucas, 645 So.2d 425 (Fla.1994); State v. Delva, 575 So.2d 643 (Fla.1991); Blandon v. State, 657 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Diez v. State, 359 So.2d 55, 56 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Romero v. State, 341 So.2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 346 So.2d 1250 (Fla.1977); see generally Lavado v. State, 492 So.2d 1322 (Fla.1986)(approving and adopting Judge Pearson’s dissent in Lavado v. State, 469 So.2d 917 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
679 So. 2d 322, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8880, 1996 WL 470975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shmuel-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.