Shives v. Frohberg

1913 OK 617, 136 P. 399, 40 Okla. 85, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 19
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided November 4, 1913·No. 2976·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding in error is brought to reverse a judgment rendered upon a demurrer to the evidence, and the errors complained of consist only of errors alleged to *86 have occurred on the trial. The record fails to disclose that a motion for a new trial was filed in the trial court, which motion is necessary in order to review the errors complained of. State v. Poor, 33 Okla. 376, 125 Pac. 726; Stump v. Porter et al., 31 Okla. 157, 120 Pac. 639; State v. Adams, 31 Okla. 775, 123 Pac. 1127; Campbell v. Lane, 31 Okla. 757, 123 Pac. 1061.

The motion to dismiss is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shives v. Frohberg, 1913 OK 617, 136 P. 399, 40 Okla. 85, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 19 (Okla. 1913).

1913 OK 617 (Shives v. Frohberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Campbell v. Lane
1912 OK 333 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
State v. Poor
1912 OK 528 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Stump v. Porter
1912 OK 74 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
State v. Adams
1912 OK 426 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)