Shiver v. Shiver

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Shiver v. Shiver

576 So. 2d 671, 1991 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 62, 1991 WL 15011

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedFebruary 6, 1991

DocketCiv. 7660

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 576 So. 2d 671 (Shiver v. Shiver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shiver v. Shiver, 576 So. 2d 671, 1991 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 62, 1991 WL 15011 (Ala. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

L. CHARLES WRIGHT, Retired Appellate Judge.

Following an ore tenus proceeding, Stevie L. Shiver and Kimesa E. Shiver were divorced by a final decree entered by the Circuit Court of Geneva County. The wife was awarded custody of the two minor children. The husband appeals and asserts that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding custody to the wife and that the findings of the trial court are unsupported by the evidence.

A child custody award incident to divorce is a matter within the discretion of the trial court. Cole v. Cole, 442 So.2d 120 (Ala.Civ.App.1983). The paramount consideration in deciding which parent should have custody is the health, safety, and well-being of the children. Ex parte Hilley, 405 So.2d 708 (Ala.Civ.App.1981).

Where a custody award is made after an ore tenus proceeding, this court will presume that the trial court correctly applied its discretionary authority to adjudge the child’s best interests. Cole. This presumption arises because the trial court is in the best position to see and hear the witnesses. Cole. We will reverse the trial court only if it has abused its discretion or if the judgment is so unsupported by the evidence as to appear clearly and plainly [672]*672wrong. Lightfoot v. Bylsma, 412 So.2d 813 (Ala. Civ.App.1982). If the decree is supported by credible evidence, it is our duty to affirm it. Cole.

Our review of the record convinces us that the trial court properly considered the health, safety, and well-being of the children in exercising its discretion to award custody to the wife. Furthermore, we find the evidence adequately supports the trial court’s judgment. There was no abuse of discretion here. This case is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Appellate Judge L. CHARLES WRIGHT while serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of § 12-18-10(e), Code 1975, and this opinion is hereby adopted as that of the court.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

L. CHARLES WRIGHT, Retired Appellate Judge.

Following an ore tenus proceeding, Stevie L. Shiver and Kimesa E. Shiver were divorced by a final decree entered by the Circuit Court of Geneva County. The wife was awarded custody of the two minor children. The husband appeals and asserts that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding custody to the wife and that the findings of the trial court are unsupported by the evidence.

A child custody award incident to divorce is a matter within the discretion of the trial court. Cole v. Cole, 442 So.2d 120 (Ala.Civ.App.1983). The paramount consideration in deciding which parent should have custody is the health, safety, and well-being of the children. Ex parte Hilley, 405 So.2d 708 (Ala.Civ.App.1981).

Where a custody award is made after an ore tenus proceeding, this court will presume that the trial court correctly applied its discretionary authority to adjudge the child’s best interests. Cole. This presumption arises because the trial court is in the best position to see and hear the witnesses. Cole. We will reverse the trial court only if it has abused its discretion or if the judgment is so unsupported by the evidence as to appear clearly and plainly [672]*672wrong. Lightfoot v. Bylsma, 412 So.2d 813 (Ala. Civ.App.1982). If the decree is supported by credible evidence, it is our duty to affirm it. Cole.

Our review of the record convinces us that the trial court properly considered the health, safety, and well-being of the children in exercising its discretion to award custody to the wife. Furthermore, we find the evidence adequately supports the trial court’s judgment. There was no abuse of discretion here. This case is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Appellate Judge L. CHARLES WRIGHT while serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of § 12-18-10(e), Code 1975, and this opinion is hereby adopted as that of the court.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

576 So. 2d 671, 1991 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 62, 1991 WL 15011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shiver-v-shiver-alacivapp-1991.

Opinion

L. CHARLES WRIGHT, Retired Appellate Judge.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack