Shively v. State

567 So. 2d 46, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7354, 1990 WL 140275
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 26, 1990
DocketNo. 87-02949
StatusPublished

This text of 567 So. 2d 46 (Shively v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shively v. State, 567 So. 2d 46, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7354, 1990 WL 140275 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We hold that the trial judge erred in imposing costs without affording the appellant his due process rights of notice and an opportunity to be heard. Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989).

[47]*47Accordingly, we strike the imposition of costs without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition after proper notice.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wood v. State
544 So. 2d 1004 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
567 So. 2d 46, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7354, 1990 WL 140275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shively-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.