Shively v. Shively

88 N.E.2d 280, 54 Ohio Law. Abs. 527
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 23, 1948
DocketNo. 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 88 N.E.2d 280 (Shively v. Shively) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shively v. Shively, 88 N.E.2d 280, 54 Ohio Law. Abs. 527 (Ohio Ct. App. 1948).

Opinions

OPINION

By THE COURT:

This is an action seeking the partition of jointly owned real estate brought by a husband against the wife. The trial court granted the relief sought.

The appellant is contending that the statute does not authorize a partition under this state of facts. This question has been passed upon by the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County in the case of Shafer v. Shafer, 30 Oh Ap 298, the syllabus of which is as follows:

“Under §§7998, 7999 and 8001 GC, evidencing a complete emancipation of the wife, in so far as separate property was concerned, except as to dower rights, the wife may bring an action in partition against the husband as to real estate owned jointly.”

Upon the authority of this case, the judgment is affirmed.

WISEMAN, PJ, MILLER and HORNBECK, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pavy v. Pavy
98 N.E.2d 224 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1951)
Shively v. Shively
95 N.E.2d 276 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 N.E.2d 280, 54 Ohio Law. Abs. 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shively-v-shively-ohioctapp-1948.