Shively v. Shively
88 N.E.2d 280, 54 Ohio Law. Abs. 527
Opinions
OPINION
This is an action seeking the partition of jointly owned real estate brought by a husband against the wife. The trial court granted the relief sought.
The appellant is contending that the statute does not authorize a partition under this state of facts. This question has been passed upon by the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County in the case of Shafer v. Shafer, 30 Oh Ap 298, the syllabus of which is as follows:
“Under §§7998, 7999 and 8001 GC, evidencing a complete emancipation of the wife, in so far as separate property was concerned, except as to dower rights, the wife may bring an action in partition against the husband as to real estate owned jointly.”
Upon the authority of this case, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shively v. Shively, 88 N.E.2d 280, 54 Ohio Law. Abs. 527 (Ohio Ct. App. 1948).
88 N.E.2d 280 (Shively v. Shively) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pavy v. Pavy
98 N.E.2d 224 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1951)
Shively v. Shively
95 N.E.2d 276 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1950)