Shiveley v. Kirby

Fourth Circuit

Shiveley v. Kirby

32 F. App'x 119

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 16, 2002·No. No. 01-7789·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Junior Shiveley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the ap[120] peal on the reasoning of the district court. See Shiveley v. Kirby, No. CA-99-392 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

David Junior Shiveley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the ap[120] peal on the reasoning of the district court. See Shiveley v. Kirby, No. CA-99-392 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Shiveley v. Kirby, 32 F. App'x 119 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

32 F. App'x 119 (Shiveley v. Kirby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related