Shive v. State

126 N.E.2d 5, 234 Ind. 704, 1955 Ind. LEXIS 191
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided April 26, 1955·No. No. 0-399·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam

This is an attempt to appeal from a proceedings described by petitioner (pro se) as a “Motion to Vacate Judgment.” Because of the fact that it was filed after term-time, it must be considered a petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis. State ex.rel. McManamon et al. v. Blackford Circuit Court et al. (1950), 229 Ind. 3, 95 N. E. 2d 556.

[705] The appeal is not accompanied by a transcript or an assignment of errors as required by Rule 2-3 of this court and is therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Note.—Reported in 126 N. E. 2d 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shive v. State, 126 N.E.2d 5, 234 Ind. 704, 1955 Ind. LEXIS 191 (Ind. 1955).

126 N.E.2d 5 (Shive v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
146 N.E.2d 86 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1957)
Book v. Indianapolis-Marion Bldg. Authority
126 N.E.2d 5 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1955)