Shiva v. State
This text of 782 So. 2d 501 (Shiva v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Basdeo SHIVA, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
*502 Basdeo Shiva, Bonifay, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The order summarily denying Appellant's motion for postconviction relief is affirmed, without prejudice to his filing an amended timely sworn motion for postconviction relief challenging the voluntary and intelligent character of his plea. See Mortimer v. State, 770 So.2d 743 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). As the Second District did in Murphy, we certify conflict with Booker v. State, 771 So.2d 1187 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).
GUNTHER, STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
782 So. 2d 501, 2001 WL 313877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shiva-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.