Shisler v. Curtis

156 So. 317, 116 Fla. 55, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1012
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 31, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 156 So. 317 (Shisler v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shisler v. Curtis, 156 So. 317, 116 Fla. 55, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1012 (Fla. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Davis, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that the judgment in this cause should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the said judgment should be reversed. When members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered, and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 So. 317, 116 Fla. 55, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shisler-v-curtis-fla-1934.