Home/New York Court of Appeals/Shiseido Cosmetics (America) , Ltd. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

Shiseido Cosmetics (America) , Ltd. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

419 N.E.2d 346, 52 N.Y.2d 916, 437 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2155
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 10, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 419 N.E.2d 346 (Shiseido Cosmetics (America) , Ltd. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shiseido Cosmetics (America) , Ltd. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board, 419 N.E.2d 346, 52 N.Y.2d 916, 437 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2155 (N.Y. 1981).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs. We agree, and for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division, that there is not sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole to support the determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board that respondent discriminated against complainant because of her national origin in violation of the Human Rights Law.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheikh v. Habib Bank Ltd.
270 A.D.2d 107 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
419 N.E.2d 346, 52 N.Y.2d 916, 437 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shiseido-cosmetics-america-ltd-v-state-human-rights-appeal-board-ny-1981.