Shiseido Cosmetics (America) , Ltd. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board
419 N.E.2d 346, 52 N.Y.2d 916, 437 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2155
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. We agree, and for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division, that there is not sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole to support the determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board that respondent discriminated against complainant because of her national origin in violation of the Human Rights Law.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shiseido Cosmetics (America) , Ltd. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board, 419 N.E.2d 346, 52 N.Y.2d 916, 437 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2155 (N.Y. 1981).
419 N.E.2d 346 (Shiseido Cosmetics (America) , Ltd. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sheikh v. Habib Bank Ltd.
270 A.D.2d 107 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)