Shirvanian v. Gonzales
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so [682]*682insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam); see also 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.
All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
218 F. App'x 681 (Shirvanian v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.