Shiro v. Shiro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shiro v. Shiro

238 A.D. 778

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shiro v. Shiro. Read the opinion of the Court — 237 A.D. 122 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1933·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument granted, and such reargument having been had, the order appealed from is modified in so far as to grant the motion to the extent of fixing the referee’s fees in the sum of $750, and as so modified affirmed, without costs, and the order of this court entered December 20, 1932, vacated. Settle order on notice. Present — Finch, P. J., Martin, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ. [See 237 App. Div. 122.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument granted, and such reargument having been had, the order appealed from is modified in so far as to grant the motion to the extent of fixing the referee’s fees in the sum of $750, and as so modified affirmed, without costs, and the order of this court entered December 20, 1932, vacated. Settle order on notice. Present — Finch, P. J., Martin, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ. [See 237 App. Div. 122.]

Shiro v. Shiro, 238 A.D. 778 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

238 A.D. 778 (Shiro v. Shiro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related